| CDHS | Printable View |
Lobbying on behalf of Humanist principlesby Tim Gordinier Director of Public Policy, Institute for Humanist Studies
This is the recap of a talk given at the Mar. 14, 2004 CDHS monthly meeting.
RECAP
– March meeting CDHS by
Tiya Madden Politics
is too serious to be left to the politicians - Charles DeGaulle. Dr.
Tim Gordinier, IHS, Director of Public Policy, spoke at the March meeting on
Lobbying and Humanism. He began by summarizing important recent and pending
cases including the California Supreme Court ruling obligating religious
hospitals to maintain the same emergency services as secular hospitals, the
Davey vs.
Locke decision that a state is not required to subsidize a theology degree if their
constitution prohibits it, and the pending Newdow Pledge-of-Allegiance case.
Gordinier also discussed the various methods of political activism along with
the different types of lobbying and their effects and then the issues that the
IHS lobbies for. Ways
to be politically active, or "Power Politics", include: Protest politics: Legal methods include marches and demonstrations
while illegal methods include nonviolent civil disobedience, such as sit-ins,
etc. The weaknesses of this approach are that it can be hard to sustain and the
audience may get compassion fatigue. Consequently, one has to reserve this
approach for clear-cut cases of injustice. There is the potential for backlash,
so you have to choose the right time and place to act and utilize the normal
channels. Campaign politics: This can be challenging. Not-for-profits (501c3)
are forbidden from becoming partisan (i.e. endorsing a candidate). The
opposition often has more money, and taking sides in campaigns can run the risk
of splitting support in your organization. Also, there is no guarantee that the
officials you support will eventually take the actions you want. Judicial Politics: To quote Gordinier: "while some people
might regard these two words as an oxymoron, many on both sides of the
political spectrum have, over the course of history, accused judges of
substituting their own personal or political proclivities for legal standards.
Roe v.
Wade and Brown v. Board of Education were regarded at the time they were
decided as being "political," but most people today accept these
progressive rulings today as good law." Right now, progressive forces face
much difficulty advancing their agenda. Not only are there few favorable
landmark decisions likely to come our way, but in the current situation, we are
experiencing a regression in terms of progressive rulings. More persuasive types of political action include: The "good citizen" model: This approach includes
attending town meetings, voter registration drives, and writing letters to the
editor. The limitations are that it can be too polite and not pushy enough in
terms of accomplishing an agenda. Media/PR Grassroots Lobbying: This involves talking to a mass audience and
includes a combination of the "good citizen" and "Media/PR"
model. Direct Lobbying: Lobbying (which got its name from the practice
of approaching Ulysses S Grant in order to push an agenda as he was in the
lobby) is an attempt by an organization to directly influence legislation in
face-to-face meetings with public officials including staff and executive
agencies. Often it is combined with grassroots lobbying. Lobbying is protected
by the right to petition and assemble. However, it is heavily regulated. There
are rules against "revolving door" actions in which officials leave
public office and then earn large sums of money to immediately come back as
lobbyists. Also, Not-For-Profits – religious groups, charities, etc. –are
limited to 5% of lobbying. However, social welfare organizations, 501(c)4s, can
do a lot of lobbying. Tax exemptions are involved. Registration and reporting
requirements are strict and reports need to be filed every two months. How to influence legislation: Take advantage of
coinciding interests (no need to visit them often, but fence-sitters need more
frequent attention) Self-interest: officials will support your agenda if it
helps them stay elected. Be big and powerful. Work with allies. Do the
legislators’ work for them, such as provide help to write the laws and advise
on constitutionality. Demonstrate you have a sizable and active constituency
(this is a good tactic when the others fail. If the officials receive 10-15
letters, they start taking notice). Challenges that Humanists face: The main problem is that
politicians don't like to be seen with atheists. The IHS is working to educate
elected officials so that they understand that freethinkers are ethical human
beings. Setting up includes: Agenda making: research issues(know pros and
cons, appeal to them on their turf – i.e. appeal to conservatives that
emergency contraception will reduce the number of abortions and save tax
dollars) Target legislators: send out feelers to determine sources of support.
Visits. Follow-up. Do's: Have a presentation. Build trust (by providing
information when requested and making sure things told in confidence stay that
way). Have a unique angle. Research. Be polite Don't: Overreach – a desired outcome can take many
years Advantages of Lobbying: It is relatively discreet.
You will get better access than voting or protests. It is one-on-one. It is a
good way to meet contacts. Money is not always a factor – passion and staying
power works too. Over the long haul: It's good to remember Mark Twain's words:
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it’s the size of the fight in
the dog". Even though it is discouraging when the opposition has enormous
financial resources, one must put in the fight anyway, and be willing to
continue the fight when it comes back again. You do this by: Maintaining
contacts, constant massaging, creating a database, keeping your expectations
realistic, staying motivated. The IHS lobbying philosophy: IHS gets involved in an
issue if religion or superstition is having an undue influence on legislation. IHS is working on: Repealing
Penal Law 260.15, which is a religious exemption eliminating the punishment for
child neglect. Under this law, if a parent can offer a religious rationale for
not seeking hospital care for their child, they may escape punishment if no
permanent harm comes to the child. Clergy
Notification Bill. Lobbying to support law that would require clergy members to
report cases of suspected child abuse. Death
with dignity. Patients’ rights regarding end-of-life issues. Women's
reproductive choices. Can't be based on religious rationale. Many areas need
improvement. Gay
rights. Other church/state issues. Contact us for further information at info@humanistsociety.org Send website comments to webmaster@humanistsociety.org Return to CDHS Home |
|