A Respone to the Article "Letter of Debate: Religion vs. Modern Science."

Ahmad Ullah

E mail : aullah@hotmail.com

http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news/apr/09/gv4n533.htm

 

I read Mr. Avijit Roy’s article "on discrediting the indications of science in the Qur’an. First of all Qur’an is not a book of science, it is book of guidance for the humanity. This book has taught the humanity that every human being is born sinless ( CONTRARY TO THE BELIEF OF ORIGINAL SIN COMMITTED BY EVE BEING PASSED TO EVERY SOUL BORN HELD BY CHRISTINITY), that by birth all human being are equal (NOT CONDEMNED TO BE INFERIOR THAN OTHER BECAUSE THEY BORN TO A CERTAIN GROUP OF HUMANITY), that human being bow their head in submission only to the One and ONLY Creator. But to help understand the power of the Almighty and to consolidate the belief in Allah, the one and the only creator and sustainer of the universe has given some signs of His creation in His Holy Book.

I understand that Mr. Roy is a research scientist on software engineering and not a classical linguist to understand and interpret the Qur’anic Arabic. Most of his scriptural

criticism were on the Muslim Holy Book, yet personally he does not have any understanding of the ancient Arabic language. He may have knowledge about

"Sanskrit" which he could use to understand and interpret Hindu Scripture.

To misinterpret Qur’an by reading the English translation and taking English text out of context is totally unscientific. He should note that of the non-Arab translator of the Qur’an admit their limitation in translating Qur’an and make a point to tell the reader that it is only a meaning according to their understanding of the Arabic language. Most of the translator of the Qur’an are non Arab and so used the common known vocabulary of the english language. Moreover many of the modern scientific vocabulary were logically not known during the time of revealation of the Qur’an and so the vocabulary pertaining to the natural phenomena were used according the understanding of the people of that time.

If you would expect  that Qur’an would mention about chromosome, gene, DNA,

zygote, cellulor differentiation, mutation, quark, plasma, supernova etc.,ctc., Qur’an would have been rejected right at the time of its revealation as a meaningless book. Many of the recent arabic language scholar are rephrasing some of meaning of the natural phenomena  mentioned in qur’an in the light of recent vocabulary. When it is mentioned in the Qur’an about the wide expanse of the earth, it doesnot mean that the earth is flat. If it was true then in another verse Qur’an would not say that the earth and sun swim on its own orbit. I would ask Mr. Roy to read an article appeared in the "Scientific American " sometime during early 80’s and he would learn about the contribution early Muslim astronomer made to the science of astronomy.

This was possible because those astronomer got their inspiration from the Qur’an to explore the heaven to understand the greatness of the creator. Allah created Human being as the best of the creation and endowed him with intellect to conquer to a certain extent the nature. In the Qur’an it is allegorically mentioned when Allah created the Adam, He asked angels to bow before Adam, all but one refused to submit to Adam. His reason was he is superior to Adam because Adam is made of Clay and He is made of smokeless fire. Allah said to this particular angel "Iblis" that Adam is superior to you because I have endowed him with knowledge. The Iblis was cursed for his disobedience. The important point is Allah has made human superior to all forms of life and so naturally they would be creative and innovative.

Professional expert like Professor Keith Moore, a renowned human embryology expert and french surgeon Maurice Bucaille just to name a few westerner have supported the Qur’anic indications of scientific phenomena and who is a soft ware engineer to refute those findings. Our problem is when we get some material knowledge and schooling in a particular descipline we pretend to behave like we are the master of all trade. Human knowledge is very very limited. Imagine all your life you have studied, earned a Ph.D. in a very narrow field of knowledge and worked in even in a narrower field and yet you know very little. People Like Sir Issac Newton once said when he was addressed as a man of wisdom that he is just playing with a few pebbles in the vast beach and the mighty ocean of knowledge is still far far away. So, be modest and accept the fact that we are mortals with lots of limitation and we would never know all that is to be known.