Dear Mukto-Monas,

Now that March 26 is knocking at the door, a vile campaign is underway in Bangladesh to distort the history of our glorious independence movement. The ruling BNP is trying their best to credit the then Major Ziaur Rahman for an announcement that he made on behalf of Awami Chief Sheikh Mujib.

I found the following article in today's (Mar 24, 2002) The Bangladesh Observer, which addresses the same question, i.e., who did declare the independence of Bangladesh. The author, A.M. Abdus Sattar, put together a write-up on this topic that is verifiable and it bears truth. I hope this article will thwart the evil design of BNP. By creating a miasma over this declaration issue, the BNP and its Islamic alliance members are trying to divide our people in Bangladesh. A nation that distorts its history of independence movement is bound to suffer. Let us thwart their effort and establish the fact over a folk lore the ruling party is trying so hard to establish Ziaur Rahman -- a despot -- as one of the founding fathers of Bangladesh.

Sincerely,

A.H. Jaffor Ullah

--------------------------------------------------------------

The Declaration Of Independence 

On 26th March, 1971  

By A. M. Abdus Sattar  

I made extensive research to find out who first made the declaration of independence and when My finding are in brief, inter alia, as follows:  

Now the question is: What is the relevancy of distorting of fact of history, ascribing something to Ziaur Rahman which he himself in his life time did never claim and re-writing history and printing students text-books involving a huge amount of public money? Ziaur Rahman admitted in different ways that he had declared independence "on behalf of our great leader Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on 27th March, 1971, from Kalurghat Biplobi Betar Kendra" and acknowledged Bangabandhu as Father of the Nation in his article published in the weekly periodical Bichitra of 26th March, 1974.  

In the present Bangladesh context by distorting history to glorify Ziaur Rahman the protagonists thereof are in reality desecrating his memory. Whether one likes Sheikh Mujib or not, he shall remain in history as the dreamer and architect of Bangladesh.  

Further, this declaration of independence was incorporated by the elected representatives of Bangladesh in their Proclamation of Independence on 10th April, 1971, and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh was sworn in on 17th April,1971, with Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as its President. Major Ziaur Rahman was appointed a Sector Commander under the said government and later on a Brigade Commander. This Proclamation of Independence has become part of our constitution (Paragraph 3 (1) of the Fourth Schedule). Anything done in contravention of any provision of the constitution is illegal and void.  

Now let us look back to the facts of history.  

Pakistan emerged as a new country on 14th August, 1947, Soon after its creation it came to be felt by the Bangalees that the ruling elite in West Pakistan consisting of the army and the civil bureaucracy, the feudals and the business magnates who had migrated from India, were arrogating to themselves the fruits of freedom in all spheres of the national life. The first major blow to the Bangalees came on the question of their demand to make Bangla one of the state languages of Pakistan. It culminated in the shedding of blood on 21st February, 1952, and the following day. This set the whole of East Bengal ablaze with anger and resentment against the West Pakistanis. Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s arrogant statement on 21st March, 1948, in the Racecourse maidan (now Suhrawardy Udyan) and repeated on 24th March, 1948, in the Dhaka University Convocation address generated a new sense of separateness among the Bangalees about their distinct identity as Bangalees. Agitation of the Bangalees moved apace. There was the general election in 1954 and the United Front with its, 21-point programme presented before the people of East Bengal won a landslide victory, sweeping away the Muslim League from the political area of East Bengal. Martial Law was clamped on 7th October, 1958, by Iskander Mirza who was overthrown by Ayub Khan on 27th October, 1958.  

Thereafter, there was the 17-day Indo-Pakistan war commencing on 6th September, 1965. During that period India could have easily occupied East Pakistan, but did not, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman who had harboured the idea of an independent Bangladesh took full advantage of the situation. In the National Conference in Lahore he floated his historic 6-point programme on 5th February, 1966. Overtly it was a programme for autonomy, but covertly it was a programme for eventual independence for Bangladesh. Sheikh Mujib and his party Awami League carried the message of the programme throughout East Pakistan and the people overwhelmingly accepted it.  

The Agartala Conspiracy Case with Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as the main accused created such a revulsion in the whole of East Pakistan that Ayub Khan had to quit, handing over power to General Yahya Khan. Yahya Khan announced a general election throughout Pakistan on the basis of one man, one vote. Awami League secured 167 seats out of 169 for East Pakistan, thus becoming an absolute majority party in the National Assembly of Pakistan, having 167 seats out of 313 seats for the whole of Pakistan. Election to the women seats could not be held.

Yahya Khan called a sitting the National Assembly for 3rd March. 1971, but on 1st March, 1971 he abruptly prorogued the sitting of the National Assembly sine die. This was a clear manifestation of the conspiracy of the Pakistan’s coterie including Z. A Bhutto to frustrate the result of the election and not to hand over power to Awami League.  

A non-cooperation movement was started and the whole civil administration took orders from Bangabandhu. Pakistani’s authority remained confined in the cantonment only.  

Earlier, the Awami League Parliamentary Party had elected Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Leader and Syed Nazrul Islam Assistant Leader of the Parliamentary Party and the Sheikh was given power to take any steps he deemed necessary for securing the rights of the people. So Sheikh Mujib earned the de facto authority to rule East Pakistan (Bangladesh). He wielded greater authority in Bangladesh than Yahya Khan had in West Pakistan even, because Yahya Khan had no such mandate from the people anywhere in Pakistan. The Bangalee military officers and other Bangalee military personnel also in their hearts within had their allegiance to the Sheikh. In the eye of recognized international law Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was the legitimate authority to rule Bangladesh while the Pakistan’s ruling elite headed by Yahya Khan was an alien power in Bangladesh inasmuch as the Awami League Parliamentary Party and its leader Bangabandhu embodied the sovereign will of the people of Bangladesh and had therefore the legitimate authority to declare the independence of Bangladesh which was a juridical act in continuation of the de factor authority he was exercising by the all-out non-cooperation movement against the alien power. This was in consonance with the intentionally accepted principles. Ziaur Rahman’s declaration was a surrogate act on behalf of Bangabaundhu. The basis of the Declaration of Independence of America on July 4, 1776, in Philadelphia may be referred to herein below:  

"When in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.  

There were declarations of independence of "East Pakistan" (not Bangladesh) by Maulana Bhasani in his own ways, but those had no juridical value as he had no such mandate from the people. So none took notice of them.

As a matter of fact, none waited for a formal declaration of independence. Sporadic skirmishes had already begun in different places. Captain Rafiqul Islam of EPR had already revolted in Chittagong.  

Had there been no formal declaration of independence by Bangabandhu even on 26th March, 1971, there would have been the Mujibnagar Government representing the people of Bangladesh and the war of liberation conducted under its control, because the field was already made ready by 23 years of sustained movement for creation of such a situation and Bangabandhu’s March 7 speech was the de fact declaration of independence. The words used therein were superbly statesmanlike to preempt any scope for the alien enemy to swoop down on the people right then. There was therein a programme outlined for a guerrilla-type warfare. The Declaration of Independence by America was adopted by the Continental Congress by the Representatives of the United States of America in General Congress assembled. Freedom of a nation is achieved not by a sudden declaration by somebody, but by years of sustained struggle therefor.

Bangabandhu’s legitimacy to the fatherhood of the Bangalee nation cannot however, in any way detract from the very valuable contributions made by different personalities from time to time– the political leaders like Shere -E-Bangla A. K. Fazlul Huq, Maulana Bhasani, H. S. Suhrawardy and many other political leaders and workers and others in different fields in different ways from 1947 to 1971 and the sacrifices made by them to achieve freedom for Bangladesh.

--------------------

A.M. Abdus Sattar is a Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and a columnist. This article was published on March 24, 2002, in The Bangladesh Observer through whose courtesy it appears in NFB.
[source : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mukto-mona/message/5114 ]